1950 Holden FX vs. 1996 Toyota 4Runner

To start off, 1996 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota 4Runner (123 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 880 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota 4Runner (295 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1996 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications: