1950 Holden FX vs. 1999 Lincoln LS
To start off, 1999 Lincoln LS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lincoln LS (211 HP) has 160 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Lincoln LS weights approximately 682 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lincoln LS (278 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1999 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 1999 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Holden | Lincoln |
Model | FX | LS |
Year Released | 1950 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 211 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 278 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1652 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2990 mm |