1950 Holden FX vs. 2000 Lotus Elise
To start off, 2000 Lotus Elise is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Elise (143 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Elise should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Holden FX weights approximately 250 kg more than 2000 Lotus Elise.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Elise (174 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 Lotus Elise will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 2000 Lotus Elise | |
Make | Holden | Lotus |
Model | FX | Elise |
Year Released | 1950 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 143 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2310 mm |