1950 Holden FX vs. 2000 Saleen S7
To start off, 2000 Saleen S7 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 7,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Saleen S7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Saleen S7 (550 HP) has 499 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Saleen S7 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Saleen S7 weights approximately 277 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Holden FX | 2000 Saleen S7 | |
| Make | Holden | Saleen |
| Model | FX | S7 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 7000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 550 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1247 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4755 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1981 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1041 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2692 mm |
