1950 Holden FX vs. 2002 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2002 Ford Windstar is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Windstar (150 HP) has 99 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX.
Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Holden FX | 2002 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Holden | Ford |
| Model | FX | Windstar |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 150 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3066 mm |
