1950 Holden FX vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX.
Because 2003 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1950 Holden FX has manual transmission. 1950 Holden FX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Holden | Ford |
Model | FX | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2490 mm |