1950 Holden FX vs. 2003 Honda Logo

To start off, 2003 Honda Logo is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Honda Logo (64 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Honda Logo should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Holden FX weights approximately 30 kg more than 2003 Honda Logo.

Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda Logo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda Logo. (108 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1950 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda Logo.

Compare all specifications:

1950 Holden FX 2003 Honda Logo
Make Holden Honda
Model FX Logo
Year Released 1950 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2165 cc 1343 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 51 HP 64 HP
Torque 136 Nm 108 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 970 kg 940 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 3790 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1580 mm 1530 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2370 mm