1950 Holden FX vs. 2003 MCC ForTwo

To start off, 2003 MCC ForTwo is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Holden FX (51 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2003 MCC ForTwo. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Holden FX weights approximately 240 kg more than 2003 MCC ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC ForTwo. (80 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1950 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC ForTwo.

Compare all specifications:

1950 Holden FX 2003 MCC ForTwo
Make Holden MCC
Model FX ForTwo
Year Released 1950 2003
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 2165 cc 698 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 51 HP 49 HP
Torque 136 Nm 80 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 1800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 970 kg 730 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 2510 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1580 mm 1540 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 1810 mm