1950 Holden FX vs. 2004 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2004 Nissan 350Z is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan 350Z (287 HP) has 236 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan 350Z weights approximately 489 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan 350Z (372 Nm) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Holden FX | 2004 Nissan 350Z | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | FX | 350Z |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 3490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 287 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1459 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2660 mm |
