1950 Holden FX vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP) has 194 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 869 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (383 Nm) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Holden FX | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | FX | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 245 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 383 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1839 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2610 mm |
