1950 Holden FX vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (188 HP) has 137 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1046 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | FX | Tundra |
Year Released | 1950 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 3376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 188 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 298 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 2016 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3270 mm |