1950 Holden FX vs. 2005 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2005 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar X-Type (228 HP) has 177 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 735 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jaguar X-Type is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar X-Type will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar X-Type (279 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 2005 Jaguar X-Type | |
Make | Holden | Jaguar |
Model | FX | X-Type |
Year Released | 1950 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 228 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 279 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2590 mm |