1950 Holden FX vs. 2005 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (147 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 864 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (343 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 2005 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Holden | Jeep |
Model | FX | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1950 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 147 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 343 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1834 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2660 mm |