1950 Holden FX vs. 2005 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2005 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Holden FX (51 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2005 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 2005 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Holden FX weights approximately 225 kg more than 2005 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 ZAZ Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Holden FX | 2005 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Holden | ZAZ |
| Model | FX | Wagon |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 50 HP |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2330 mm |
