1950 Holden FX vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Galant
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Galant is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Galant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Galant (230 HP) has 179 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Galant should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX.
Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Galant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Galant (339 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Galant will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 2006 Mitsubishi Galant | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | FX | Galant |
Year Released | 1950 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 3835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 230 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 339 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2760 mm |