1950 Holden FX vs. 2007 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2007 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP) has 181 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 2007 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | FX | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 232 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2710 mm |