1950 Holden FX vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Renault Clio (111 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Renault Clio weights approximately 510 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Renault Clio (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2007 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 2007 Renault Clio | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | FX | Clio |
Year Released | 1950 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 111 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2580 mm |