1950 Holden FX vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,775 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 890 kg more than 1950 Holden FX.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Holden | Jeep |
Model | FX | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1950 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 2775 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2650 mm |