1950 Holden FX vs. 2008 Mazda Etude
To start off, 2008 Mazda Etude is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda Etude weights approximately 75 kg more than 1950 Holden FX.
Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Etude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda Etude (143 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda Etude will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 2008 Mazda Etude | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | FX | Etude |
Year Released | 1950 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1597 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 143 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2620 mm |