1950 Holden FX vs. 2009 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (235 HP) has 184 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (351 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Holden FX | 2009 Mazda CX-7 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | FX | CX-7 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 235 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 351 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2760 mm |
