1950 Holden FX vs. 2009 Renault Megane
To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Megane (111 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX.
Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Megane (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 2009 Renault Megane | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | FX | Megane |
Year Released | 1950 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 111 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2690 mm |