1950 Holden FX vs. 2010 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2010 Ford Falcon is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Falcon (387 HP) has 336 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Falcon (520 Nm) has 384 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX. 2010 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 1950 Holden FX has manual transmission. 1950 Holden FX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 2010 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Holden | Ford |
Model | FX | Falcon |
Year Released | 1950 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 387 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 520 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2838 mm |