1950 Holden FX vs. 2010 Honda Jazz

To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Jazz (77 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Jazz weights approximately 78 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Holden FX (136 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Jazz. (110 Nm). This means 1950 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Jazz.

Compare all specifications: