1950 Holden FX vs. 2010 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2010 Renault Fluence is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Fluence (110 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Fluence weights approximately 255 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Holden FX | 2010 Renault Fluence | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | FX | Fluence |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 110 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4618 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1809 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1478 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2702 mm |
