1950 Holden FX vs. 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero
To start off, 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 6,350 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero (1,269 HP) has 1218 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero weights approximately 280 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero | |
Make | Holden | SSC |
Model | FX | Ultimate Aero |
Year Released | 1950 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 6350 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 1269 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1090 mm |