1950 Holden FX vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP) has 103 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX.
Because 2011 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Holden FX | 2011 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | FX | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 180 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3010 mm |
