1950 Holden FX vs. 2011 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2011 Nissan Pixo is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX.
Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 2011 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | FX | Pixo |
Year Released | 1950 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2360 mm |