1950 Holden FX vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo (99 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX.
Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Holden FX (136 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (130 Nm). This means 1950 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Holden | Chevrolet |
Model | FX | Aveo |
Year Released | 1950 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 99 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 130 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2525 mm |