1950 Holden FX vs. 2012 Chevrolet Sonic
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Sonic is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Sonic (138 HP) has 87 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Sonic should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX.
Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Sonic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Sonic (169 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Sonic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 2012 Chevrolet Sonic | |
Make | Holden | Chevrolet |
Model | FX | Sonic |
Year Released | 1950 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 169 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2525 mm |