1950 Holden FX vs. 2012 Ford Ka
To start off, 2012 Ford Ka is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Ka (68 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX.
Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1950 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 2012 Ford Ka | |
Make | Holden | Ford |
Model | FX | Ka |
Year Released | 1950 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 68 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2450 mm |