1950 Holden FX vs. 2012 Renault Wind
To start off, 2012 Renault Wind is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Wind weights approximately 236 kg more than 1950 Holden FX.
Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Wind, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 2012 Renault Wind | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | FX | Wind |
Year Released | 1950 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3822 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1698 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1415 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2368 mm |