1950 Jaguar MK V vs. 1963 Triumph TR4
To start off, 1963 Triumph TR4 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 3,485 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Jaguar MK V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Jaguar MK V (123 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1963 Triumph TR4. (104 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Jaguar MK V should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph TR4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Jaguar MK V weights approximately 715 kg more than 1963 Triumph TR4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Jaguar MK V | 1963 Triumph TR4 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Triumph |
| Model | MK V | TR4 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3485 cc | 2138 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 965 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2240 mm |
