1950 Jaguar MK V vs. 2002 Jaguar XK8
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XK8 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XK8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XK8 (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1950 Jaguar MK V. (123 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XK8 should accelerate faster than 1950 Jaguar MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XK8 weights approximately 54 kg more than 1950 Jaguar MK V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Jaguar MK V | 2002 Jaguar XK8 | |
Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
Model | MK V | XK8 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3485 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 1734 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2600 mm |