1950 Jaguar MK V vs. 2002 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2002 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 3,485 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Jaguar MK V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1950 Jaguar MK V. (123 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1950 Jaguar MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Jaguar MK V weights approximately 290 kg more than 2002 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Jaguar MK V | 2002 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | MK V | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3485 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2710 mm |