1950 Jaguar MK V vs. 2003 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XJ is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 3,485 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Jaguar MK V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XJ (240 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1950 Jaguar MK V. (123 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1950 Jaguar MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Jaguar MK V weights approximately 135 kg more than 2003 Jaguar XJ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Jaguar MK V | 2003 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
| Model | MK V | XJ |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3485 cc | 2968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 1545 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3040 mm |
