1950 Jaguar MK V vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 3,485 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Jaguar MK V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Jaguar MK V (123 HP) has 17 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Jaguar MK V should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Jaguar MK V weights approximately 705 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Jaguar MK V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Jaguar MK V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Jaguar MK V | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Jaguar | MCC |
Model | MK V | Smart |
Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3485 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 106 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2510 mm |