1950 Jaguar MK V vs. 2012 BMW X3
To start off, 2012 BMW X3 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 3,485 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Jaguar MK V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW X3 (300 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1950 Jaguar MK V. (123 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1950 Jaguar MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW X3 weights approximately 235 kg more than 1950 Jaguar MK V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 BMW X3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Jaguar MK V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Jaguar MK V | 2012 BMW X3 | |
| Make | Jaguar | BMW |
| Model | MK V | X3 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3485 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 1915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4648 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1881 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1675 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2810 mm |
