1950 Jaguar MK V vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 3,485 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Jaguar MK V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 114 more horse power than 1950 Jaguar MK V. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1950 Jaguar MK V.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Jaguar MK V | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
| Model | MK V | XF |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3485 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 237 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2908 mm |
