1950 Jaguar MK V vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (233 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1950 Jaguar MK V. (123 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1950 Jaguar MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 397 kg more than 1950 Jaguar MK V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Jaguar MK V | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | MK V | Tundra |
Year Released | 1950 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3485 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 233 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 2077 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 5329 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1935 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3221 mm |