1950 Jaguar XK vs. 1982 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1982 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1950 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Jaguar XK | 1982 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Jaguar | Volkswagen |
Model | XK | Polo |
Year Released | 1950 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 39 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2400 mm |