1950 Jaguar XK vs. 2003 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XJ is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Jaguar XK | 2003 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
Model | XK | XJ |
Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 294 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3040 mm |