1950 Jaguar XK vs. 2004 Renault Grand Espace
To start off, 2004 Renault Grand Espace is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 2,958 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Renault Grand Espace is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1950 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Grand Espace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Jaguar XK | 2004 Renault Grand Espace | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | XK | Grand Espace |
Year Released | 1950 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2958 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2750 mm |