1950 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1965 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1965 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Jeep CJ3A (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 210 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Jeep CJ3A | 1965 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | CJ3A | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1950 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2290 mm |