1950 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1976 Morgan 4
To start off, 1976 Morgan 4 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Morgan 4 (85 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Morgan 4 should accelerate faster than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 444 kg more than 1976 Morgan 4.
Because 1950 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Morgan 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Morgan 4. (135 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1950 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Morgan 4.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Jeep CJ3A | 1976 Morgan 4 | |
Make | Jeep | Morgan |
Model | CJ3A | 4 |
Year Released | 1950 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 666 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2450 mm |