1950 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1982 Opel Manta
To start off, 1982 Opel Manta is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 100 kg more than 1982 Opel Manta.
Because 1950 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Opel Manta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Jeep CJ3A | 1982 Opel Manta | |
Make | Jeep | Opel |
Model | CJ3A | Manta |
Year Released | 1950 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2530 mm |