1950 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1986 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,354 cc, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1950 Jeep CJ3A.
Because 1950 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Jeep CJ3A | 1986 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ3A | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1950 | 1986 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 246 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2430 mm |