1950 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1988 Volvo 480
To start off, 1988 Volvo 480 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Volvo 480 (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Volvo 480 should accelerate faster than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 70 kg more than 1988 Volvo 480.
Because 1950 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1988 Volvo 480. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Volvo 480 (176 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1988 Volvo 480 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Jeep CJ3A | 1988 Volvo 480 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | CJ3A | 480 |
Year Released | 1950 | 1988 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1721 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2510 mm |