1950 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1990 Mercury Capri
To start off, 1990 Mercury Capri is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Mercury Capri (100 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Mercury Capri should accelerate faster than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 30 kg more than 1990 Mercury Capri.
Because 1950 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Mercury Capri. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Mercury Capri. (130 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1950 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Mercury Capri.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Jeep CJ3A | 1990 Mercury Capri | |
Make | Jeep | Mercury |
Model | CJ3A | Capri |
Year Released | 1950 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2410 mm |