1950 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2000 Suzuki XL6

To start off, 2000 Suzuki XL6 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Suzuki XL6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Suzuki XL6 (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Suzuki XL6 should accelerate faster than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Suzuki XL6 weights approximately 335 kg more than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Suzuki XL6 (218 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm). This means 2000 Suzuki XL6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. 2000 Suzuki XL6 has automatic transmission and 1950 Jeep CJ3A has manual transmission. 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Suzuki XL6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: