1950 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2002 Kia Optima

To start off, 2002 Kia Optima is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Kia Optima (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Optima weights approximately 322 kg more than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1950 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Kia Optima. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Kia Optima (216 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm). This means 2002 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Jeep CJ3A.

Compare all specifications:

1950 Jeep CJ3A 2002 Kia Optima
Make Jeep Kia
Model CJ3A Optima
Year Released 1950 2002
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2199 cc 2497 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 59 HP 138 HP
Engine RPM 3600 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 145 Nm 216 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1110 kg 1432 kg
Vehicle Length 3130 mm 4740 mm
Vehicle Width 1460 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1630 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2040 mm 2710 mm